Bankruptcy Attorney in Buckeye, Glendale, Mesa and Surprise Arizona

 Allegrucci Law Office, PLLC is a general practice with our practice areas set forth below. We have a heavy emphasis on unpaid debt resolution and insolvency issues.

 
Allegrucci Law Office, PLLC offers free initial consultations for bankruptcy cases. Our services include:   

• As of December 31, 2021 the Phoenix Bankruptcy Court records David Allegrucci being involved with 3,888 different bankruptcy matters since the year 1992.  
• When comparing law firms to represent you in a bankruptcy proceeding Allegrucci Law Office may seem a little old fashioned. Mr. Allegrucci believes that a person should only spend money on essentials such as the experience summarized on this page. Any electronic convenience offered by another law office has a cost from that service provider. These cumulative costs are then passed onto the client resulting in a higher fee charged for a bankruptcy representation. By keeping this process simple as possible Mr. Allegrucci can charge his clients less than the few attorneys that have practiced in the bankruptcy field as long as he has.                   
• Civil Defense and Collection Litigation. To date Mr. Allegrucci has defended clients in 136 civil collection lawsuits.   
• Divorce   
• Unpaid Income Tax issues through offers-in-compromise, installment agreements, appeals, innocent and injured spouse relief.          
• Probate, Wills, Trusts, Beneficiary Deeds, and Power of Attorney.  

                    We are a debt relief agency we assist people in filing bankruptcy. 

For your convenience, we have offices in:           SURPRISE                 BUCKEYE                     MESA                NORTH PHOENIX                      

To learn more about the law practice of David Allegrucci you may want to read one or more of the cases reported below to see the type of legal work that he has handled. Activate the link to the case name to read the court decision.  

In re Kuehn, 177 B.R. 671 (Bankr. D. Ariz. 1995) This matter involved the legal issue as to whether a Chapter 13 bankruptcy trustee could demand turnover of future income tax refunds as a matter of course for disbursement to creditors.   

In re Gurney, 192 B.R. 529 (9th Cir. BAP 1996). This matter involved a legal issue as to whether the statute of limitations on an Arizona Department of Revenue tax claim was tolled by successive Chapter 13 bankruptcy filings.   

In re Collier, 193 B.R. 1, (Bankr. D. Ariz. 1996) This matter involved a legal issue as to when the 60 month period for plan payments begins to run in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy proceeding.  

 
In re Niles, 342 B.R. 72 (Bankr. D. Ariz.2006) This matter involved the issue as to what property had to be turned over to a Chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee when the case was converted from a Chapter 13 bankruptcy proceeding.   

No. CV-09-0738-PHX-GMS  (Ariz. Dist. Ct. 2009) This matter involved a defense to a motion to dismiss a bankruptcy proceeding, on the grounds the position of the U.S. Trustee, violated the 13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution barring involuntary servitude.  

In re Reyes, 482 B.R. 603 (Ariz. Dist. Ct. 2012) This matter involved a challenge to a number of procedures a Chapter 13 trustee was requiring before he would agree to confirmation of Chapter 13 plans of reorganization.    

 In re Romeo, AZ-17-1215-BLKu (9th Cir. BAP 2018).  This matter involved a challenge to a Chapter 13 bankruptcy trustee's efforts to review Federal income tax returns filed on the case docket. The Chapter 13 bankruptcy trustee's demands that copies of state income tax returns be sent directly to him were also challenged.